Photo Credit: Albert H. Teich / Shutterstock.com
September 15, 2013
|
Free-market libertarians go to outrageous exremes to convince
themselves and others of the infallibility of the market. Even when
opposing evidence smacks them in the face, they conjure up sound bites
that seem vaguely convincing but are in reality meaningless. Here are
some examples.
1. A Free Market is Good for Everyone.
Milton Friedman was
a magician with words, making reality disappear: "There is no
alternative way so far discovered of improving the lot of the ordinary
people [than] the free-enterprise system...The free market system
distributes the fruits of economic progress among all people."
The
Cato Institute added their own banality: "Free markets create a future promoting integrity and trust."
2. The Market Works. It Just Doesn't Feel Like It.
The
Wall Street Journal,the
Heritage Foundation, and
The Economist have teamed up to try to convince us all is well. The
Wall Street Journal exclaims,
"Middle-class Americans have more buying power than ever before."
Perhaps the Journal staff should compare notes. Their own writer
tells us that "the middle class...has shrunk considerably over the past few decades."
The Heritage Foundation
contends that
"In reality, the living conditions of poor Americans have shown
significant improvement over time." Heritage may equate living
conditions with TV sets and window air conditioners, but for the rest of
us
many studies show the
relationship between poverty and ill health -- chronic diseases, depression, and a slew of other physical and emotional maladies.
Finally,
The Economist states: Before
the 1960s...most blacks were poor, few served in public office and
almost none were to be found flourishing at the nation's top
universities, corporations, law firms and banks. None of that is true
today. But much of that IS true today. According to
Pew Research,
median wealth for black families in 2009 was $5,677, compared to
$113,149 for white families. Meanwhile, Blacks and Hispanics, with
29% of the population, are severely under-represented in both the
corporate boardroom and
higher education.
3. Why Can't You Be a Successful Individual Like Me?
The
Wall Street Journal published a remarkably self-congratulatory
article that
is, once again, short on facts and high on emotion. "The American
dream," trumpets the author, "has traditionally been one of individual
success that is rewarded and admired." Perhaps he's not aware of the
recent
Executive Excess study that
found "Nearly 40 percent of the CEOs on the highest-paid lists from the
past 20 years were eventually 'bailed out, booted, or busted.'" And how
about that "individual success" part? The fact is that the richest 10%
own
almost 90 percent of stocks excluding pensions, and the stock market has historically risen
three times faster than the GDP itself. Success comes easy when you can make money just by going to bed at night.
The
author goes on to announce, "In Silicon Valley, the rich commonly
reinvest their wealth close to home...I have reinvested most of my net
worth in 8.5% of the shares of my own company." Good for him. But
Over 90% of the assetsowned by millionaires are held in a combination of low-risk investments (bonds and cash), the stock market, and real estate.
Business startup costs made up less than 1% of the
investments of high net worth individuals in North America in 2011.
Perhaps,
instead, they're building businesses on their own? No. Only 3 percent
of the CEOs, upper management, and financial professionals were
entrepreneurs in 2005, even though they made up about 60 percent of the richest .1% of Americans. A recent
study found
that less than 1 percent of all entrepreneurs came from very rich or
very poor backgrounds. They come from the middle class.
4. If You're Not a Successful Individual, You Must Be Lazy.
The Cato Institute
claimed that
"Welfare currently pays more than a minimum-wage job in 35 states, even
after accounting for the Earned Income Tax Credit, and in 13 states it
pays more than $15 per hour."
Both the
Economic Policy Institute and the
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities discredit
the claim, noting that, contrary to Cato's implications, hardly any
families receive multiple benefits at the same time. Furthermore, the
benefits do not replace work. Many employed families are simply not
making enough to survive. Over
83 percent of all benefits going to low-income people are for the elderly, the disabled, or working households.
5. If I Accomplish Everything on My Own, Why Should I Pay Taxes?
Using their pet buzzwords 'capital' and 'mobility,' the Wall Street Journal came to the roundabout
conclusion that
a lower capital gains tax rate would end up causing higher-income
taxpayers to pay more taxes. The logic is too elusive to explain here.
The Journal also
attacks the
Financial Transaction Tax, calling it a "sin tax" that will "punish
sinners" to raise revenue for the U.S. Treasury. Never mind that the
current sales tax on financial transactions is ZERO.
Robert Reich recently
noted that people without arguments often resort to personal attacks. They also resort to pleasant-sounding nonsense.
Paul Buchheit is a college
teacher, a writer for progressive publications, and the founder and
developer of social justice and educational websites
(UsAgainstGreed.org, PayUpNow.org, RappingHistory.org).
No comments:
Post a Comment